The Illusion of Knowledge

~ "A little learning is a dang'rous thing; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, And drinking largely sobers us again.” --Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

The Illusion of Knowledge

Monthly Archives: July 2013

“Obstructionist” Republicans

31 Wednesday Jul 2013

Posted by Milton in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a Comment

In reference to Obama’s legacy potentially being one of failure, Ron Fournier writes in the National Journal today:

Actually, it’s hard to argue that it wouldn’t be his legacy. History judges U.S. presidents based upon what they did and did not accomplish. The obstinacy of their rivals and the severity of their circumstances is little mitigation. Great presidents overcome great hurdles.

In Obama’s case, the modern GOP is an obstructionist, rudderless party often held hostage by extremists. So … get over it. His response to The New York Times is another illustration that Obama and his liberal allies have a limited—and limiting—definition of presidential leadership.

This prompts the question, why does Fournier internalize the view (as many others have) that it is the GOP that is obstructionist?  After all, in our system of government, as it was conceived, it is the Congress that puts forth and passes legislation and the President’s power is supposed to be limited to approving or rejecting that legislation.  Therefore, it is at least as accurate — if not more so — to say that Obama is obstructionist in that he is thwarting legislation that Congress (or at least the House) wishes to pass.  The point here is that the word obstructionist, when it comes to legislation, is often used to pejoratively categorize the opposing side, yet there cannot be, by definition, obstructionism if the side doing the accusing were to cave in and accept the other party’s wishes.  Thus, Obama could end the obstructionism that Fournier decries if he agrees to accept all of the GOP’s policies.  Clearly, that is not the solution that Fournier has in mind, yet his writing indicates that he would like the GOP to do precisely this.  Obstructionism may be an obstacle to achieving one’s utopia, but Fournier and co. should bear in mind that a system of checks and balances only works because of the ability of the party out of power to obstruct the wishes  of the party in power.  Thank god for it.

♣ Search

♣ Archives

  • May 2017 (1)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (4)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (1)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (1)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (4)
  • August 2013 (4)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (5)
  • April 2013 (5)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (4)
  • April 2012 (5)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • December 2011 (5)
  • November 2011 (2)

Blogroll

  • Cost of Government
  • Greg Mankiw's Blog
  • Reason
  • The American

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.